Fortunately, the Ohio County, Kentucky Tax Books, 1799-1875 are available for viewing on Family Search. Even though these images aren't indexed, it was fairly easy to find the images for the 'T' portion of the alphabet. (Note: I also recorded information for the Igleharts while viewing this resource.)
I found a John Thompson listed in 1820. This John Thompson was over 21 and owned a horse.
In 1821, the only Thompson's I found were a John Tompson and a John Thompson -- both over 21 with John Tompson owning a horse. In 1822, there was only 1 Thompson (Tompson) listing -- John Thompson with two horses. In 1823, John Thompson still owned 2 horses but he also owned 50 acres of land on the Rough watercourse.
In 1824, John Thompson was listed with 2 horses and NO LAND. A James Tomson was also listed.
In 1825, there weren't any Thompsons listed on the tax role. This was true of 1826, 1827 and 1828.
Since it has been a while since I've used tax records in my research, I used the Family Search wiki for Kentucky Tax Records to learn more about these records and what they might be telling me about John Thompson.
From the data I collected, I now have more questions:
- Is the John Thompson in the tax record the father of James Thompson? If so, then the John Thompson in the tax record would not be my ancestor.
- Could John Thompson and James Thompson be brothers? If so, then the John Thompson in the tax record could be my ancestor?
- Who was the 2nd John Thompson (Tompson) in 1821? Is this a father/son situation?
- Is the John Thompson in these tax records from 1820 to 1824 my ancestor?
At this point, I don't have enough information to determine whether these tax records are for my John Thompson.
I have a tree that has Thompson’s - way back. But I’m not a “true” researcher. Abigail Thompson is my 10th great aunt from 1600s daughter of a John Thompson. 🤣😳😂
ReplyDeleteI wish I had my Thompson line back to the 1600s. Unfortunately, this is one of my brick walls. I have John Thompson getting married in 1820 in KY with no records prior to that.
ReplyDelete